Scanned text contains errors.
dramatic writers, and in quotations preserved by the grammarians ; and those for which no authority can be produced were in all probability drawn from the same source, and not arbitrarily coined to answer the purpose of the moment, as some critics have imagined. The least faulty, perhaps, of all his pieces is the Apologia. Here he spoke from deep feeling, and although we may in many places detect the inveterate affectation of the rhetorician, yet there is often a bold, manly, straight-forward heartiness and truth which we seek in vain in those compositions where his feelings were less touched.
We do not know the year in which our author was born, nor that in which he died. But the names of Lollius Urbicus, Scipio Orfitus, Severianus, Lollianus Avitus, and others who are incidentally mentioned by him as his contemporaries, and who from other sources are known to have held high offices under the Antonines, enable us to determine the epoch when he flourished.
The extant works of Appuleius are : I. Meta-morpJioseon sen de Asino Aureo Libri XI. This celebrated romance, which, together with the ovos of Lucian, is said to have been founded upon a work bearing the same title by a certain Lucius of Patrae (Photius, Bill. cod. cxxix. p. 165) belonged to the class of tales distinguished by the ancients under the title of Milesiae fabulae. It seems to have been intended simply as a satire upon the hypocrisy and debauchery of certain orders of priests, the frauds of juggling pretenders to supernatural powers, and the general profligacy of public morals. There are some however who discover a more recondite meaning, and especially the author of the Divine Legation of Moses, who has at great length endeavoured to prove, that the Golden Ass was written with the view of recommending the Pagan religion in opposition to Christianity, which was at that time making rapid progress, and especially of inculcating the importance of initiation into the purer mysteries. (Div. Leg. bk. ii. sect, iv.) The epithet Aureus is generally supposed to have been bestowed in consequence of the admiration in which the tale was held, for being considered as the most excellent composition of its kind, it was compared to the most excellent of metals, just as the apophthegms of Pythagoras were distinguished as XPvff& eTrrj. Warburton, however, ingeniously contends that aureus was the common epithet bestowed upon all Milesian tales, because they were such as strollers used to rehearse for a piece of money to the rabble in a circle, after the fashion of oriental story-tellers. He founds his conjecture upon an expression in one of Pliny's Epistles (ii. 20), assem para, et accipe auream fabulam, which seems, however, rather to mean " give me a piece of copper and receive in return a story worth a piece of gold, or, precious as gold," which brings us back to the old explanation. The well-known and exquisitely beautiful episode of Cupid and Psyche is introduced in the 4th, 5th, and 6th books. This, whatever opinion we may form of the principal narrative, is evidently an allegory, and is generally understood to shadow forth the progress of the soul to perfection.
II. Floridorum Libri IV. An dvOoXoyia, containing select extracts from various orations and dissertations, collected probably by some admirer. It has, however, been imagined that we have here a sort of common-place-book, in which Appuleius
registered, from time to time, such ideas and forms of expression as he thought worth preserving, with a view to their insertion in some continuous composition. This notion, although adopted by Ou-dendorp, has not found many supporters. It is wonderful that it should ever have been seriously propounded.
III. De Deo Socratis Liber. This treatise has been roughly attacked by St. Augustine.
IV. De Dogmate Platonis Libri tres. The first book contains some account of the speculative doctrines of Plato, the second of his morals, the third of his logic.
V. De Mundo Liber. A translation of the work TTfpl Kofffj-ov, at one time ascribed to Aristotle.
VII. Hermetis Trismegisti De Natura Deorum Dialogus. Scholars are at variance with regard to the authenticity of this translation of the Ascle-pian dialogue. As to the original, see Fabric. Bibl. Graec. i. 8.
Besides these a number of works now lost are mentioned incidentally by Appuleius himself, and many others belonging to some Appuleius are cited by the grammarians. He professes to be the author of " poemata, omne genus apta virgae, lyrae, soccOj cothurno, item satiras ac griplios^ item historias varias rerum nee non orationes laudatas disertis nee non dialogos laudatos philosophis," both in Greek and Latin (Florid, ii. 9, iii. 18, 20, iv. 24) ; and we find especial mention made of a collection of poems on playful and amatory themes, entitled Ludicra, from which a few fragments are quoted in the Apologia, (pp. 408, 409, 414; compare 538,)
The Editio Princeps was printed at Rome, bj Sweynheym and Pannartz, in the year 1469, editec by Andrew, bishop of Aleria. It is excessively rare, and is considered valuable in a critical poin of view, because it contains a genuine text honestl; copied from MSS., and free from the multitude o conjectural emendations by which nearly all th rest of the earlier editions are corrupted. It is moreover, the only old edition which escaped mu tilation by the Inquisition.
An excellent edition of the Asinus appeared a Leyden in the.year 1786, printed in 4to., an edited by Oudendorp and Ruhnken. Two add tional volumes, containing the remaining work: appeared at Leyden in 1823, edited by Bosch; A new and very elaborate edition of the who' works of Appuleius has been published at Leipzi; 1842, by G. F. Hildebrand.
A great number of translations of the Golde Ass are to be found in all the principal Europe? languages. The last English version is that I Thomas Taylor, in one volume 8vo., Londo 1822, which contains also the tract De D Socratis. [W. R.]
L. APPULEIUS, commonly called appulei B are a r us, a botanical writer of whose life no pi ticulars are known, and whose date is rather unci tain. He has somtimes been identified with Apr. leius, the author of the " Golden Ass," and son times with Appuleius Celsus [celsus, appuleiu; but his work is evidently written later than the ti: of either of those persons, and probably cannot placed earlier than the fourth century after Chr It is written in Latin, and entitled Herbarium,